Argentina vs Morocco: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Argentina
- Morocco
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 15,846 t against 14,662 t in Morocco, a difference of 1,184 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 41st and Morocco ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Morocco in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19,855 t | 8,099 t | 11,756 t | Argentina |
| 1970s | 24,883 t | 10,203 t | 14,681 t | Argentina |
| 1980s | 20,368 t | 12,934 t | 7,434 t | Argentina |
| 1990s | 14,701 t | 14,047 t | 653.76 t | Argentina |
| 2000s | 10,787 t | 13,741 t | 2,954 t | Morocco |
| 2010s | 12,089 t | 17,827 t | 5,738 t | Morocco |
| 2020s | 19,687 t | 14,177 t | 5,510 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Argentina or Morocco?
- Argentina, at 15,846 t against 14,662 t in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Argentina and Morocco?
- 1,184 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Morocco?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Morocco rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Argentina ranks 41st and Morocco ranks 43rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).