Armenia vs Costa Rica: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Armenia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 841.04 t against 750.42 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 90.62 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Armenia ranks 115th and Costa Rica ranks 117th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 653.26 t | 750.06 t | 96.8 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 815.3 t | 699.86 t | 115.44 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1,017 t | 826.19 t | 190.79 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 738.08 t | 769.39 t | 31.31 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Armenia or Costa Rica?
- Armenia, at 841.04 t against 750.42 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 90.62 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Armenia ranks 115th and Costa Rica ranks 117th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).