Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 38,029 t against 37,178 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 851 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,100 t | 34,584 t | 19,484 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 17,394 t | 33,996 t | 16,602 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 26,422 t | 37,736 t | 11,314 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 32,184 t | 40,805 t | 8,621 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Australia and New Zealand or Kazakhstan?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 38,029 t against 37,178 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan?
- 851 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).