Australia and New Zealand vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus

Australia and New Zealand
38,029 t
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of)
0.2429 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
18th
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
18th

Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 38,029 t against 0.2429 t in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 38,029 t.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 186 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Micronesia (Federated States of) Difference Ahead
1990s 14,814 t 1.33 t 14,812 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 17,394 t 0.3638 t 17,393 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 26,422 t 0.2507 t 26,422 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 32,184 t 0.2415 t 32,183 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Australia and New Zealand or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 38,029 t against 0.2429 t in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Australia and New Zealand and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
38,029 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/australia-and-new-zealand/micronesia-federated-states-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/australia-and-new-zealand/micronesia-federated-states-of/">Australia and New Zealand vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).