Bangladesh vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bangladesh
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 54,158 t against 53,978 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 180 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 16th and Poland ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,239 t | 49,625 t | 35,386 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 15,469 t | 57,744 t | 42,275 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 20,600 t | 61,662 t | 41,062 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 24,220 t | 55,818 t | 31,598 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 30,124 t | 46,632 t | 16,508 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 39,880 t | 44,418 t | 4,538 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 51,051 t | 53,723 t | 2,672 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Bangladesh or Poland?
- Poland, at 54,158 t against 53,978 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Bangladesh and Poland?
- 180 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Poland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Bangladesh ranks 16th and Poland ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).