Barbados vs Cabo Verde: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Barbados
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 7.17 t against 7.17 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 178th and Cabo Verde ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Cabo Verde in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.39 t | 16.51 t | 6.89 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 19.31 t | 11.98 t | 7.34 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 17.47 t | 13.28 t | 4.19 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 16.33 t | 10.45 t | 5.88 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 13.82 t | 13.01 t | 0.8077 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 8.73 t | 9.7 t | 0.9674 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 7.33 t | 6.97 t | 0.3592 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Barbados or Cabo Verde?
- Barbados, at 7.17 t against 7.17 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Barbados and Cabo Verde?
- 0 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cabo Verde?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Cabo Verde rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Barbados ranks 178th and Cabo Verde ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).