Barbados vs Dominica: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Barbados
- Dominica
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 8.81 t against 7.17 t in Barbados, a difference of 1.64 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 165th and Dominica ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Dominica in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.39 t | 20.88 t | 2.51 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 19.31 t | 19.79 t | 0.4765 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 17.47 t | 16.18 t | 1.29 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 16.33 t | 11.43 t | 4.9 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 13.82 t | 10.92 t | 2.9 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 8.73 t | 9.75 t | 1.01 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 7.33 t | 8.8 t | 1.47 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Barbados or Dominica?
- Dominica, at 8.81 t against 7.17 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Barbados and Dominica?
- 1.64 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Dominica rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Barbados ranks 165th and Dominica ranks 163rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).