Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mozambique: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 6,541 t against 6,419 t in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 122 t.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 69th and Mozambique ranks 67th of 186 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,404 t | 3.96 t | 6,400 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 6,210 t | 4.83 t | 6,205 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 5,196 t | 3.41 t | 5,192 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 6,022 t | 699.48 t | 5,322 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Belgium-Luxembourg or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 6,541 t against 6,419 t in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique?
- 122 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Mozambique rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 69th and Mozambique ranks 67th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).