Bhutan vs Iceland: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bhutan
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 239.13 t against 238.83 t in Bhutan, a difference of 0.3 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 140th and Iceland ranks 139th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 6 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 160.05 t | 99.64 t | 60.4 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 188.75 t | 73.22 t | 115.53 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 212.61 t | 108.09 t | 104.52 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 216.99 t | 95.16 t | 121.83 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 294.31 t | 121.21 t | 173.1 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 250.98 t | 202.45 t | 48.53 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 227.65 t | 311.83 t | 84.17 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Bhutan or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 239.13 t against 238.83 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Bhutan and Iceland?
- 0.3 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Iceland rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Bhutan ranks 140th and Iceland ranks 139th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).