Brazil vs Indonesia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Brazil
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 74,559 t against 62,303 t in Brazil, a difference of 12,256 t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 11th and Indonesia ranks 10th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Indonesia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,823 t | 4,112 t | 8,711 t | Brazil |
| 1970s | 18,019 t | 9,256 t | 8,763 t | Brazil |
| 1980s | 28,475 t | 28,644 t | 168.68 t | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 26,222 t | 47,252 t | 21,030 t | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 24,051 t | 63,972 t | 39,922 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 32,961 t | 75,833 t | 42,871 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 54,269 t | 73,751 t | 19,482 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Brazil or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 74,559 t against 62,303 t in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Brazil and Indonesia?
- 12,256 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Indonesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Indonesia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Brazil ranks 11th and Indonesia ranks 10th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).