Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus

Brazil
62,303 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
302,376 t
in 2023
Brazil rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th

Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Brazil
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 302,376 t against 62,303 t in Brazil, a difference of 240,073 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.9 times Brazil's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 201 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 12,823 t 123,682 t 110,860 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 18,019 t 151,348 t 133,329 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 28,475 t 167,811 t 139,336 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 26,222 t 164,620 t 138,398 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 24,051 t 196,253 t 172,202 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 32,961 t 262,329 t 229,368 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 54,269 t 303,700 t 249,431 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Brazil or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 302,376 t against 62,303 t in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
240,073 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
Brazil ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).