Burkina Faso vs Ethiopia PDR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 13,046 t against 12,111 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 935 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 49th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,586 t | 9,001 t | 7,415 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 1,739 t | 12,147 t | 10,408 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 2,671 t | 14,912 t | 12,241 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 4,091 t | 14,380 t | 10,289 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Burkina Faso or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 13,046 t against 12,111 t in Burkina Faso as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR?
- 935 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Burkina Faso ranks 49th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).