Cambodia vs Hungary: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cambodia
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 15,519 t against 14,504 t in Cambodia, a difference of 1,015 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Cambodia ranks 41st and Hungary ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,201 t | 7,951 t | 5,750 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 1,524 t | 11,840 t | 10,316 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 2,074 t | 15,217 t | 13,142 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 3,889 t | 11,981 t | 8,093 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 6,452 t | 11,145 t | 4,693 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 11,090 t | 12,470 t | 1,381 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 13,823 t | 13,512 t | 311 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Cambodia or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 15,519 t against 14,504 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Cambodia and Hungary?
- 1,015 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Hungary rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Cambodia ranks 41st and Hungary ranks 39th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).