Congo vs Eritrea: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 719.46 t against 710.8 t in Congo, a difference of 8.66 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 133rd and Eritrea ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 415.01 t | 434.01 t | 19 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 483.12 t | 552.19 t | 69.07 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 622.79 t | 710.76 t | 87.97 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 694.72 t | 719.21 t | 24.48 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Congo or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 719.46 t against 710.8 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Congo and Eritrea?
- 8.66 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Congo ranks 133rd and Eritrea ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).