Costa Rica vs Libya: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Costa Rica
- Libya
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 750.42 t against 747.42 t in Libya, a difference of 3 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 117th and Libya ranks 118th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 267.11 t | 495.61 t | 228.5 t | Libya |
| 1970s | 485.08 t | 736.83 t | 251.75 t | Libya |
| 1980s | 683.97 t | 987.07 t | 303.11 t | Libya |
| 1990s | 750.53 t | 918.78 t | 168.26 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 699.86 t | 814.63 t | 114.76 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 826.19 t | 781.58 t | 44.61 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 769.39 t | 736.24 t | 33.15 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Costa Rica or Libya?
- Costa Rica, at 750.42 t against 747.42 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Costa Rica and Libya?
- 3 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Libya rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Costa Rica ranks 117th and Libya ranks 118th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).