Costa Rica vs Yemen: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Costa Rica
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 843.92 t against 750.42 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 93.5 t.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 117th and Yemen ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 267.11 t | 1,127 t | 860.08 t | Yemen |
| 1970s | 485.08 t | 1,306 t | 820.73 t | Yemen |
| 1980s | 683.97 t | 1,242 t | 557.95 t | Yemen |
| 1990s | 750.53 t | 1,615 t | 864.82 t | Yemen |
| 2000s | 699.86 t | 1,555 t | 855.24 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 826.19 t | 1,237 t | 410.63 t | Yemen |
| 2020s | 769.39 t | 1,129 t | 360.02 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Costa Rica or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 843.92 t against 750.42 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Costa Rica and Yemen?
- 93.5 t, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Yemen rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Costa Rica ranks 117th and Yemen ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).