Cuba vs Nicaragua: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4,487 t against 4,098 t in Cuba, a difference of 389 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 84th and Nicaragua ranks 83rd of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,361 t | 1.75 t | 1,360 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 2,989 t | 2.66 t | 2,986 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 4,010 t | 4.92 t | 4,005 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 3,466 t | 13.39 t | 3,453 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 4,509 t | 25.93 t | 4,483 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4,660 t | 1,374 t | 3,286 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 4,021 t | 3,791 t | 229.72 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 4,487 t against 4,098 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Nicaragua?
- 389 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Nicaragua rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 84th and Nicaragua ranks 83rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).