Cuba vs Togo: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 4,098 t against 3,313 t in Togo, a difference of 785 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.
Cuba ranks 95th and Togo ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,361 t | 1,447 t | 85.21 t | Togo |
| 1970s | 2,989 t | 2,030 t | 958.6 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 4,010 t | 1,779 t | 2,231 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 3,466 t | 2,365 t | 1,101 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 4,509 t | 3,121 t | 1,388 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4,660 t | 3,287 t | 1,373 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 4,021 t | 3,282 t | 739.34 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Togo?
- Cuba, at 4,098 t against 3,313 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Togo?
- 785 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 95th and Togo ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).