Cyprus vs Puerto Rico: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cyprus
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 153.34 t against 141.16 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 12.18 t.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Cyprus ranks 145th and Puerto Rico ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 236.53 t | 225.75 t | 10.78 t | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 155.56 t | 131.02 t | 24.54 t | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 173.27 t | 82.89 t | 90.38 t | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 194.33 t | 46.56 t | 147.77 t | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 154.57 t | 65.37 t | 89.19 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 126.43 t | 113.6 t | 12.83 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 157.21 t | 131.52 t | 25.69 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Cyprus or Puerto Rico?
- Cyprus, at 153.34 t against 141.16 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Cyprus and Puerto Rico?
- 12.18 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Puerto Rico rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Cyprus ranks 145th and Puerto Rico ranks 147th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).