Czechia vs Niger: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 17,893 t against 16,573 t in Czechia, a difference of 1,320 t.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 40th and Niger ranks 37th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,357 t | 7,366 t | 9,991 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 13,645 t | 11,246 t | 2,399 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 13,770 t | 16,879 t | 3,109 t | Niger |
| 2020s | 16,220 t | 17,615 t | 1,395 t | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Niger?
- Niger, at 17,893 t against 16,573 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Niger?
- 1,320 t, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Niger?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Niger rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 40th and Niger ranks 37th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).