Czechoslovakia vs Egypt: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 32,502 t against 27,568 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 4,934 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 25th and Egypt ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,472 t | 14,859 t | 8,613 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 29,569 t | 16,189 t | 13,380 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 33,015 t | 14,843 t | 18,172 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 32,201 t | 18,314 t | 13,887 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 32,502 t against 27,568 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Egypt?
- 4,934 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Egypt?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Egypt rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 25th and Egypt ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).