Czechoslovakia vs Myanmar: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 32,428 t against 27,568 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 4,860 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,472 t | 11,069 t | 12,403 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 29,569 t | 11,958 t | 17,611 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 33,015 t | 17,655 t | 15,360 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 32,201 t | 15,639 t | 16,562 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 32,428 t against 27,568 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Myanmar?
- 4,860 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Myanmar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Myanmar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).