Denmark vs Ethiopia PDR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Denmark
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 13,510 t against 13,046 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 464 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 46th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 49th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,532 t | 9,001 t | 1,531 t | Denmark |
| 1970s | 9,453 t | 12,147 t | 2,694 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 9,375 t | 14,912 t | 5,537 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 9,673 t | 14,380 t | 4,707 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Denmark or Ethiopia PDR?
- Denmark, at 13,510 t against 13,046 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Denmark and Ethiopia PDR?
- 464 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Denmark and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Denmark ranks 46th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 49th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).