Eritrea vs Libya: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 747.42 t against 719.46 t in Eritrea, a difference of 27.96 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Eritrea ranks 132nd and Libya ranks 130th of 201 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 434.01 t | 907.51 t | 473.51 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 552.19 t | 814.63 t | 262.44 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 710.76 t | 781.58 t | 70.82 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 719.21 t | 736.24 t | 17.03 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Libya?
- Libya, at 747.42 t against 719.46 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Libya?
- 27.96 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Eritrea ranks 132nd and Libya ranks 130th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).