Eritrea vs Papua New Guinea: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eritrea
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 719.46 t against 628.06 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 91.4 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 120th and Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 434.01 t | 420.07 t | 13.94 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 552.19 t | 533.41 t | 18.78 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 710.76 t | 644.8 t | 65.97 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 719.21 t | 656.4 t | 62.81 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Papua New Guinea?
- Eritrea, at 719.46 t against 628.06 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Papua New Guinea?
- 91.4 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Papua New Guinea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Papua New Guinea rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Eritrea ranks 120th and Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).