Eswatini vs Jamaica: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 220.34 t against 220.22 t in Eswatini, a difference of 0.12 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Jamaica ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Jamaica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 65.49 t | 234.64 t | 169.15 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 158.1 t | 221.69 t | 63.59 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 181.71 t | 179.82 t | 1.89 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 224.55 t | 213.09 t | 11.46 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 194.96 t | 165.71 t | 29.25 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 214.92 t | 180.71 t | 34.21 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 229.41 t | 210.05 t | 19.36 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 220.34 t against 220.22 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Jamaica?
- 0.12 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jamaica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Jamaica rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 142nd and Jamaica ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).