Ethiopia PDR vs Senegal: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Senegal
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 13,046 t against 12,413 t in Senegal, a difference of 633 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 46th and Senegal ranks 47th of 185 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,001 t | 4,746 t | 4,255 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 12,147 t | 4,819 t | 7,329 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 14,912 t | 5,187 t | 9,725 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 14,380 t | 5,097 t | 9,283 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Senegal?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 13,046 t against 12,413 t in Senegal as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Senegal?
- 633 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Senegal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Senegal rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 46th and Senegal ranks 47th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).