Ethiopia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 61,181 t against 7,081 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 54,100 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 8.6 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 12th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,423 t | 9,560 t | 3,864 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 19,690 t | 9,914 t | 9,776 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 43,796 t | 7,872 t | 35,924 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 60,665 t | 5,900 t | 54,765 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Ethiopia, at 61,181 t against 7,081 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 54,100 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 12th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).