Fiji vs Puerto Rico: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Fiji
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 147.84 t against 141.16 t in Puerto Rico, a difference of 6.68 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Fiji ranks 146th and Puerto Rico ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 5 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 112.13 t | 225.75 t | 113.62 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 119.72 t | 131.02 t | 11.3 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 120.69 t | 82.89 t | 37.8 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 103.51 t | 46.56 t | 56.95 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 85.72 t | 65.37 t | 20.35 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 127.08 t | 113.6 t | 13.48 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 139.04 t | 131.52 t | 7.52 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Fiji or Puerto Rico?
- Fiji, at 147.84 t against 141.16 t in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Fiji and Puerto Rico?
- 6.68 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Puerto Rico rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Fiji ranks 146th and Puerto Rico ranks 147th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).