Finland vs Kyrgyzstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Finland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 4,490 t against 3,986 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 504 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 82nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 186 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,770 t | 3,444 t | 3,327 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 6,899 t | 3,943 t | 2,956 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 6,122 t | 3,927 t | 2,195 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 4,809 t | 4,086 t | 723.12 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Finland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Finland, at 4,490 t against 3,986 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 504 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Finland ranks 82nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).