French Polynesia vs Grenada: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- French Polynesia
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 1.9 t against 1.3 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.6 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.5 times French Polynesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 190th and Grenada ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.05 t | 9.75 t | 8.69 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 1.58 t | 6.94 t | 5.36 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 1.85 t | 4.67 t | 2.81 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 1.54 t | 2.57 t | 1.03 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | 1.54 t | 2.33 t | 0.7985 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | 1.37 t | 2.32 t | 0.9531 t | Grenada |
| 2020s | 1.31 t | 2.08 t | 0.7692 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, French Polynesia or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 1.9 t against 1.3 t in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between French Polynesia and Grenada?
- 0.6 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Grenada rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- French Polynesia ranks 190th and Grenada ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).