Gabon vs Lesotho: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Gabon
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 343.25 t against 321.3 t in Gabon, a difference of 21.95 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Gabon ranks 149th and Lesotho ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 110.76 t | 157.77 t | 47.01 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 197.16 t | 191.87 t | 5.29 t | Gabon |
| 1980s | 258.13 t | 227.84 t | 30.29 t | Gabon |
| 1990s | 297.82 t | 337.11 t | 39.29 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 332.81 t | 211.75 t | 121.06 t | Gabon |
| 2010s | 349.9 t | 243.2 t | 106.71 t | Gabon |
| 2020s | 332.44 t | 252.95 t | 79.49 t | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Gabon or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 343.25 t against 321.3 t in Gabon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Gabon and Lesotho?
- 21.95 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Gabon and Lesotho rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Gabon ranks 149th and Lesotho ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).