Guadeloupe vs Kuwait: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guadeloupe
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 54.59 t against 31.93 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 22.66 t.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.7 times Guadeloupe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Guadeloupe ranks 168th and Kuwait ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guadeloupe averaged higher in 4 and Kuwait in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 71.61 t | 1.45 t | 70.16 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 66.78 t | 1.65 t | 65.13 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 47.7 t | 6.11 t | 41.6 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 40.44 t | 15.28 t | 25.16 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 36.6 t | 52.98 t | 16.37 t | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 31.93 t | 59.73 t | 27.79 t | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 31.93 t | 53.84 t | 21.9 t | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Guadeloupe or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 54.59 t against 31.93 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Guadeloupe and Kuwait?
- 22.66 t, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Kuwait?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guadeloupe and Kuwait rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Guadeloupe ranks 168th and Kuwait ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).