Guadeloupe vs Montenegro: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guadeloupe
- Montenegro
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 31.93 t against 11.45 t in Montenegro, a difference of 20.48 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 2.8 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Guadeloupe ranks 156th and Montenegro ranks 159th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guadeloupe averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.93 t | 131.85 t | 99.92 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 31.93 t | 47.66 t | 15.72 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 31.93 t | 11.15 t | 20.79 t | Guadeloupe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Guadeloupe or Montenegro?
- Guadeloupe, at 31.93 t against 11.45 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Guadeloupe and Montenegro?
- 20.48 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Guadeloupe and Montenegro rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Guadeloupe ranks 156th and Montenegro ranks 159th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).