Guyana vs Uruguay: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guyana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 622.79 t against 459.8 t in Guyana, a difference of 162.99 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Guyana's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 138th and Uruguay ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 110.19 t | 1,121 t | 1,011 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 118.35 t | 960.8 t | 842.45 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 141.35 t | 1,020 t | 878.15 t | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 169.38 t | 1,036 t | 866.51 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 192.16 t | 841.61 t | 649.45 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 315.44 t | 846.22 t | 530.78 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 440.89 t | 841.5 t | 400.62 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Guyana or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 622.79 t against 459.8 t in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Guyana and Uruguay?
- 162.99 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Uruguay rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Guyana ranks 138th and Uruguay ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).