Haiti vs Honduras: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Haiti
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 921.78 t against 887.54 t in Haiti, a difference of 34.24 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 113th and Honduras ranks 111th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 3 and Honduras in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 893.23 t | 626.25 t | 266.98 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 810.19 t | 878.23 t | 68.05 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 745.66 t | 1,673 t | 927.07 t | Honduras |
| 1990s | 753.88 t | 1,779 t | 1,025 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 784.7 t | 766.33 t | 18.36 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 953.62 t | 698.73 t | 254.88 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 854.87 t | 879.64 t | 24.76 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Haiti or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 921.78 t against 887.54 t in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Haiti and Honduras?
- 34.24 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Honduras rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Haiti ranks 113th and Honduras ranks 111th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).