Haiti vs Yemen: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Haiti
- Yemen
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 887.54 t against 843.92 t in Yemen, a difference of 43.62 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yemen ahead.
Haiti ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 893.23 t | 1,127 t | 233.96 t | Yemen |
| 1970s | 810.19 t | 1,306 t | 495.62 t | Yemen |
| 1980s | 745.66 t | 1,242 t | 496.26 t | Yemen |
| 1990s | 753.88 t | 1,615 t | 861.46 t | Yemen |
| 2000s | 784.7 t | 1,555 t | 770.41 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 953.62 t | 1,237 t | 283.21 t | Yemen |
| 2020s | 854.87 t | 1,129 t | 274.54 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Haiti or Yemen?
- Haiti, at 887.54 t against 843.92 t in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Haiti and Yemen?
- 43.62 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Yemen rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Haiti ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).