Iceland vs Jamaica: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iceland
- Jamaica
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 239.13 t against 220.34 t in Jamaica, a difference of 18.79 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Iceland ranks 139th and Jamaica ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 99.64 t | 234.64 t | 135 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 73.22 t | 221.69 t | 148.46 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 108.09 t | 179.82 t | 71.73 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 95.16 t | 213.09 t | 117.93 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 121.21 t | 165.71 t | 44.5 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 202.45 t | 180.71 t | 21.74 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 311.83 t | 210.05 t | 101.78 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Iceland or Jamaica?
- Iceland, at 239.13 t against 220.34 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Iceland and Jamaica?
- 18.79 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Jamaica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Jamaica rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Iceland ranks 139th and Jamaica ranks 141st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).