Iceland vs Lebanon: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iceland
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 289.17 t against 239.13 t in Iceland, a difference of 50.04 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Iceland ranks 139th and Lebanon ranks 138th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 99.64 t | 199.28 t | 99.63 t | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 73.22 t | 235.44 t | 162.22 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 108.09 t | 217.07 t | 108.98 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 95.16 t | 348 t | 252.84 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 121.21 t | 304.32 t | 183.11 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 202.45 t | 312.06 t | 109.61 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 311.83 t | 304.35 t | 7.48 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Iceland or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 289.17 t against 239.13 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Iceland and Lebanon?
- 50.04 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Lebanon rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Iceland ranks 139th and Lebanon ranks 138th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).