Israel vs Jordan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Israel
- Jordan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 456.09 t against 412.96 t in Jordan, a difference of 43.13 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 128th and Jordan ranks 131st of 185 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 565.07 t | 141.48 t | 423.58 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 798.59 t | 122.81 t | 675.78 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 996.18 t | 194.67 t | 801.51 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 845.39 t | 218.21 t | 627.18 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 660.7 t | 233.66 t | 427.04 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 663.53 t | 330.24 t | 333.29 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 436.99 t | 399.29 t | 37.7 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Israel or Jordan?
- Israel, at 456.09 t against 412.96 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Israel and Jordan?
- 43.13 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Jordan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Israel ranks 128th and Jordan ranks 131st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).