Israel vs North Macedonia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Israel
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 502.34 t against 456.09 t in Israel, a difference of 46.25 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 128th and North Macedonia ranks 125th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 833.56 t | 846.15 t | 12.59 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 660.7 t | 675.21 t | 14.5 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 663.53 t | 585.5 t | 78.03 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 436.99 t | 522.73 t | 85.74 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Israel or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 502.34 t against 456.09 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Israel and North Macedonia?
- 46.25 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Israel and North Macedonia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Israel ranks 128th and North Macedonia ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).