Jamaica vs Lebanon: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Jamaica
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 289.17 t against 220.34 t in Jamaica, a difference of 68.83 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.3 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 141st and Lebanon ranks 138th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 234.64 t | 199.28 t | 35.36 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 221.69 t | 235.44 t | 13.75 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 179.82 t | 217.07 t | 37.24 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 213.09 t | 348 t | 134.91 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 165.71 t | 304.32 t | 138.61 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 180.71 t | 312.06 t | 131.36 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 210.05 t | 304.35 t | 94.3 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Jamaica or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 289.17 t against 220.34 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Jamaica and Lebanon?
- 68.83 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Lebanon rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Jamaica ranks 141st and Lebanon ranks 138th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).