Japan vs Sudan (former): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 10,830 t against 9,629 t in Japan, a difference of 1,201 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 54th and Sudan (former) ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 4 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30,605 t | 17,515 t | 13,090 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 29,955 t | 15,707 t | 14,248 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 18,986 t | 12,141 t | 6,844 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 13,033 t | 11,736 t | 1,297 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 11,124 t | 12,427 t | 1,303 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 9,651 t | 10,147 t | 495.7 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Japan or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 10,830 t against 9,629 t in Japan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Japan and Sudan (former)?
- 1,201 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Japan and Sudan (former) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 54th and Sudan (former) ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).