Jordan vs Namibia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Jordan
- Namibia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 412.96 t against 363.6 t in Namibia, a difference of 49.36 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.
Jordan ranks 143rd and Namibia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 141.48 t | 251.45 t | 109.97 t | Namibia |
| 1970s | 122.81 t | 257.64 t | 134.83 t | Namibia |
| 1980s | 194.67 t | 312.52 t | 117.86 t | Namibia |
| 1990s | 218.21 t | 326.16 t | 107.95 t | Namibia |
| 2000s | 233.66 t | 406.39 t | 172.73 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 330.24 t | 361.45 t | 31.21 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 399.29 t | 424.28 t | 24.99 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Jordan or Namibia?
- Jordan, at 412.96 t against 363.6 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Jordan and Namibia?
- 49.36 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Namibia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Jordan ranks 143rd and Namibia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).