Kenya vs Slovakia: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kenya
- Slovakia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 12,383 t against 10,962 t in Slovakia, a difference of 1,421 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Kenya ranks 48th and Slovakia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,162 t | 7,993 t | 830.76 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 7,430 t | 6,080 t | 1,350 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 9,938 t | 7,737 t | 2,202 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 11,324 t | 10,054 t | 1,270 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Kenya or Slovakia?
- Kenya, at 12,383 t against 10,962 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Kenya and Slovakia?
- 1,421 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Slovakia rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Kenya ranks 48th and Slovakia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).