Kyrgyzstan vs Nicaragua: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 4,487 t against 3,986 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 501 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th and Nicaragua ranks 83rd of 186 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,444 t | 14.49 t | 3,429 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 3,943 t | 25.93 t | 3,917 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 3,927 t | 1,374 t | 2,553 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 4,086 t | 3,791 t | 294.44 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Kyrgyzstan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 4,487 t against 3,986 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 501 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th and Nicaragua ranks 83rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).