Lesotho vs Namibia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lesotho
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 363.6 t against 343.25 t in Lesotho, a difference of 20.35 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.
Lesotho ranks 147th and Namibia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 157.77 t | 251.45 t | 93.68 t | Namibia |
| 1970s | 191.87 t | 257.64 t | 65.77 t | Namibia |
| 1980s | 227.84 t | 312.52 t | 84.68 t | Namibia |
| 1990s | 337.11 t | 326.16 t | 10.95 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 211.75 t | 406.39 t | 194.65 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 243.2 t | 361.45 t | 118.25 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 252.95 t | 424.28 t | 171.33 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Lesotho or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 363.6 t against 343.25 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Lesotho and Namibia?
- 20.35 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Lesotho ranks 147th and Namibia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).