Libya vs Melanesia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Libya
- Melanesia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 836.61 t against 747.42 t in Libya, a difference of 89.19 t.
That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 130th and Melanesia ranks 127th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Melanesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 495.61 t | 302.77 t | 192.84 t | Libya |
| 1970s | 736.83 t | 376.99 t | 359.83 t | Libya |
| 1980s | 987.07 t | 466.29 t | 520.79 t | Libya |
| 1990s | 918.78 t | 538.52 t | 380.26 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 814.63 t | 659.14 t | 155.48 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 781.58 t | 821.62 t | 40.04 t | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 736.24 t | 852.74 t | 116.5 t | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Libya or Melanesia?
- Melanesia, at 836.61 t against 747.42 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Libya and Melanesia?
- 89.19 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Melanesia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Libya ranks 130th and Melanesia ranks 127th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).