Lithuania vs Turkmenistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lithuania
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 6,171 t against 5,560 t in Lithuania, a difference of 611 t.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 74th and Turkmenistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,911 t | 5,861 t | 1,951 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 3,377 t | 7,715 t | 4,338 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 4,916 t | 7,875 t | 2,959 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 5,692 t | 8,691 t | 2,998 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Lithuania or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 6,171 t against 5,560 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Lithuania and Turkmenistan?
- 611 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Turkmenistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Lithuania ranks 74th and Turkmenistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).