Malaysia vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malaysia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 2,493 t against 2,452 t in South Sudan, a difference of 41 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 92nd and South Sudan ranks 94th of 186 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,724 t | 2,173 t | 551.53 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 2,620 t | 2,333 t | 286.68 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Malaysia or South Sudan?
- Malaysia, at 2,493 t against 2,452 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Malaysia and South Sudan?
- 41 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Malaysia ranks 92nd and South Sudan ranks 94th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).